The main reason I'm an atheist

[Little Rik]

That is bizarre Roz.
In the past i did produce a number of studies only to be told that i really should take in serious consideration the biggest study ever carried out by the best expert in the field Dr. Parnia.
Guess what Roz.
I did read Dr. Parnia report and guess what?
He conclude that there is no evidence for or against NDEs and more study is needed to find out
the truth. <bolded by RozKek>
So if the so called expert say no or yes how the hell mr. Roz can pop up and say no?

Wrong Prikky, what Parnia was looking for was evidence for NDEs, not evidence against. When he failed to find evidence using the parametres he set out he inserted a cock and bull "recollection" of an "NDE" told to him a year after it supposedly happened and full of details yo'd get from watching an episode of ER. He failed in his attempt to find evidence for NDEs and then tried to pass off false testimony as evidence. If you have no wvidence for the existence of a phenomenon you don't have to provide evidence of its non-existence, you can assume safely that it doesn't exist.

Parnia report is quite clear.
He concluded that there is no evidence for or against and therefore he say that more study is needed.
What he did or did not in order to come to this conclusion is totally irrelevant.
Only when he will (if he ever will) come to some conclusions we will analyze the report.
For the time being it doesn't make any sense to speculate.