(April 21, 2016 at 8:45 am)robvalue Wrote: If you're going to say there isn't allowed to be an infinite number of things, then there can't be an infinite contingency in the first place. But you can still have circular ones.
I didn't say there couldn't be an infinite number of things. I said that it doesn't seem possible that an infinite number of things can synchronously exist as a finite thing.