(April 5, 2011 at 7:52 pm)tackattack Wrote: Ashendant, the only reason for child pornography (not the act but the image of) to be is illegal, after the act has already been committed can be one or more of very few things.
1-To prevent people from seeing said images
2-Do protect the identity of the victims
3-Because society deems the act heinous enough not to have it circulating legally
If it's all #2 then you're absolutely right no intent has been broken. If it however is any of 1 or 3 (I find 1 very likely) then faking the incidents is in direct opposition to that. If you can't see something that simply opposite, then perhaps you have a bias. Perhaps I am too.
Is that a logically sound conclusion anyone:
1-At least one intent for making child pornography illegal is to prevent it from being seen
2-Some legal pornography intentionally makes their actresses seem to be below the age of consent (google jailbait if you doubt this)
3-Filming people below the age of consent is illegal and is child pornography
4-Some of the legal porn industry is in direct opposition to the intent of child pornography laws.
Because it was filmed illegally duh...
