@Sae, please don't quote the spam... you could catch a fungus.
@Ash and Sae- Back from the distraction..the intent of the law is not to deal with less hassle, you're going to have to back that claim up with some sound logic before I buy that one.
or to protect the victims.
If the act is already done why would you bother to say it's illegal to show films of it? The victims have already been victimized by that point.That protects no one other than the viewing public. Support it or your point fails Ash.
@Ash and Sae- Back from the distraction..the intent of the law is not to deal with less hassle, you're going to have to back that claim up with some sound logic before I buy that one.
or to protect the victims.
If the act is already done why would you bother to say it's illegal to show films of it? The victims have already been victimized by that point.That protects no one other than the viewing public. Support it or your point fails Ash.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
