(April 6, 2011 at 12:57 pm)tackattack Wrote: @Sae, please don't quote the spam... you could catch a fungus.
@Ash and Sae- Back from the distraction..the intent of the law is not to deal with less hassle, you're going to have to back that claim up with some sound logic before I buy that one.
or to protect the victims.
If the act is already done why would you bother to say it's illegal to show films of it? The victims have already been victimized by that point.That protects no one other than the viewing public. Support it or your point fails Ash.
Oh because pictures and videos of the victim being raped doesn't further victimise the victim...
