Back to Theism

[Eilonnwy]

A fundamentalist Christian wouldn't say that. But really, I was just pretty disgusted with religion, and I thought I'd try on an atheist hat. It didn't fit.

Thus, as explained previously, you were never an atheist.

The argument was not bullshit, it was circular. You know, you'd be amazed at the amount of words the English language has, Latin, too[/i].

So here, refute this one; we'll call it prima facie evidence for the existence of God: The universe displays intelligence; therefore, the universe is intelligent. An intelligent universe is what we call God.

http://www.logicalfallacies.info/presump...-question/

Read it, you just might learn something.

But here's the important bit just in case that was too much to read:

A circular argument fails as a proof because it will only be judged to be sound by those who already accept its conclusion.

There's also a non sequitur there at the end.