(March 26, 2009 at 5:00 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote:(March 26, 2009 at 3:17 pm)bozo Wrote: [quote='Kyuuketsuki' pid='12506' dateline='1238074034']Question: If you were sitting in judgement upon a mass murderer (the evidence is near incontrovertible) who had callously murdered (in the most brutal fashion) over a thousand people, admitted (and was even proud of) his "achievements", showed no signs of remorse and stated that he would continue to kill others in higher numbers and more bloody, brutal & dehumanising ways if at all possible would you realistically consider a death sentence?
Still no.
Not absolutely sure but I would and that I could pull the trigger myself if that was what was required ... to protect the lives of others.
Could you at least try and format your posts properly so I can see what I'm, replying to?
(March 26, 2009 at 3:17 pm)bozo Wrote:(March 26, 2009 at 9:27 am)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: You needn't give full details, just why you weren't happy. You can discuss jury trials after the event ( it's only during the trial that you are not supposed to. )
Thank you ... I said no, I meant it. This time I'm saying that because I don't see the point ... you've made up your mind and nothing I can say will change it even in the slightest ... unlike you I do not put the British legal system on a pedestal.
Kyu
I don't put our legal system on any pedestal. I simply defend the jury system as it is against your attempts at rubbishing it.
A man is born to a virgin mother, lives, dies, comes alive again and then disappears into the clouds to become his Dad. How likely is that?
