(May 4, 2016 at 10:36 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Meanwhile, even though he 'won' Indiana the race was so close that he actually now needs to win a higher percentage of the remaining delegates than before his victory.
You really are the epitome of a Clinton troll. There's no reason to put the word "won" in quotation marks when describing Sanders' victory in Indiana. Not only was he predicted to lose by 7 points, he managed to win by over 5. He won. Get over it.
Your point about needing to win a higher percentage of remaining delegates is pretty meaningless too. If he'd lost, he's need to win a much higher percentage of delegates than he does now. Nobody was expecting a landslide; in fact we were expecting a loss. Trying to sell what happened as Indiana as somehow bad for the Sanders campaign is a laughable tactic.
Clinton supporters are missing the entire reason a lot of Sanders supporters still want him in the race: we hate Clinton. We don't trust her, we think she's quite possibly a criminal, and if she's not a criminal, she's certainly not a person who has sound judgement. A Trump vs Clinton race is a race where America loses.
