RE: Pornography - are you for or against it and why?
April 10, 2011 at 10:12 am
(This post was last modified: April 10, 2011 at 10:36 am by reverendjeremiah.)
tack Wrote:I appreciate your patience in this discussion. I did post laws, but I'll post them again
Please dont...have mercy on me...you win man! You are right with everything you said and everything I said was wrong. You win.
Tack Wrote:I'll answer my own question if that will help you. I think the main and glaring reason we have child pornography image laws to protect society from seeing these images, not to protect the child victim in them, although that could be a lesser reason/byproduct. If that is the main reason then faking the images defeats the purpose of the laws, could we agree on that statement?You win man. I can no longer argue the subject. You win. All legal porn is regulated. As far as "tracking" it, I stand in AWE over the size that government will become once Tack is done with it
I am not "trying to convince me to throw grown, consenting adults in jail for play acting and ban any play acting in consenting adults sex lives" I am trying to convince you that people use faked child porn like real child porn, it increases demand for child porn (both the legal and illegal) and that it isn't necessarily illegal to film it, it should regulated/tracked at the very least.
Tack Wrote:If I made a cocaine substitute that was legal, but was pretty much exactly the same,only pink in color. Then I went and sold it to my friends as a legal cocaine substitute. I should hold some accountability (at the very least I would have severe guilt) for someone dying from an OD or going on a murdering rampage because of the stuff.
The DEA already does this. They will even go over the citizens vote, and eve the Representative and Senates head and arbitrarily make a law on the spot delcaring something a "controlled substance", and can apply a felony punishment to it. So the DEA can arbitrarily declare what you are selling is illegal and take your citizen rights and even your freedom away..arbitrarily, regardless of what society thinks of the substance.
Apparently the moderate and Conservative Americans love a government entity making arbitrary laws on the spot, seeing as they never stopped them from doing so, and even put them into that power.
If my voice mattered I would toss the entire DEA out of the door as a tax payer leech and genuine threat to American freedom. Let States set their own drug enforcement and laws.
Personally I think drugs should be a health issue, not a legal issue.
