(May 19, 2016 at 12:54 pm)pool the great Wrote:(May 19, 2016 at 12:43 pm)Thena323 Wrote: No. I'm saying that I could not justify dragging or shoving my child to his/her death, even to save the others...just because he/she happens to be available and of suitable mass.
But if you don't shove your one child to death, you're essentially killing your other 5 children. Are you somehow implying that the consequences of your inaction are nonexistent? I'm having trouble following you.
Choosing to do nothing is also choosing to do something,imo.
Never said the consequences would be non-existent. It's clear there'd be consequences all around.