I disagree that people with equal rights necessarily should never fight for equal rights. I think fighting for equal rights for those without them is a good cause for everyone. Not that everyone should go around fighting for equal rights all the time or be an active equal rights activist. People have lives and people have different lifestyles. I consider myself moral and I value morality of course (at the very least subjectively) but I wouldn't consider myself a moralizer or moralist. Not that I am necessarily against moralism but I personally am not a moralist and so in that sense (I am no moral crusader or "moralizer") I am in fact an amoralist. But when it comes to valuing morality itself I am in another sense in fact a moralist rather than an amoralist. I specify the different senses in order to avoid invalid accusations of equivocation or self-contradiction. I am being preemptive not digressing, BTW (nor am I regressing unlike Poolie Pool, 
).
).
