Evidence for atheist claims

[Angrboda]

First, as has been noted previously, there is support for these claims, so you're making them out to be unfounded is stretching the truth.  More to the point, in past you've referred to these as "atheist dogmas."  By your own admission, a dogma is a belief unsupported by evidence.  Regardless of what you think of the relative strength of the evidence, by your own definition they do not count as dogma.  Therefore, your calling them such is another stretching of the truth.

Regardless, you discount the evidence for these propositions primarily because you disagree with the conclusions.  You repeatedly trumpet your own worldview and how it can explain things when challenged with evidence for materialist propositions.  However the test of whether something is evidence or not does not lie in whether there is a competing worldview or hypothesis whose advocates believe does a better job explaining the evidence, there will always be such.  Your disagreeing with the conclusions of materialism doesn't make the evidence for those conclusions any the less evidence as evidence for your disagreeing with the inferences drawn.

Ultimately, worldviews or hypotheses have to be judged not in some absurd 'winner takes all' contest of who can spin the most consistent and compelling tale, but on a comparison of how the evidence for each worldview or hypothesis stacks up in comparison to each other.  Such a judgement doesn't come from adversarial nay-saying, but from a holistic and charitable examination of the evidence for each.

The materialist paradigm is not without its gaps and flaws, but as a whole, the materialist worldview is well evidenced with entries coming from many fields, from philosophy to quantum mechanics.   What evidence have you proffered for your worldview?  Nothing but a bunch of analogies, bare assertions, a questionable interpretation of NDEs, your 'feelies' about your meditation and your intuitions about it, the yogic tradition, and various bits of tantric lore.  If you've got something else to add to the pile, NOW is the time to introduce it.  But I've been listening to you a long time and I think it boils down to that.

Given the relative strengths of the evidence presented for each worldview as a whole, the notion that "Yoga" stands up to materialism as a viable alternate hypothesis must surely be regarded as yet another stretching of the truth.

Yog.  

I already explained what the word support is all about.
It can be a strong support made with concrete and steel or can be a support made with a weak structure
that will collapse soon.
Forget about support.
We are talking about solid evidence not bullshit.
So far there hasn't been any regarding the dogmas that I previous mention so all your long explanation
is like a weak structure that means absolutely nothing.
By the way you just forgot about your recent dogma   (unproven truth taken as real truth) about the
senses that are only physical or better say that the feeling can not be perceived by a consciousness that is not physical.

But don't worry guys.
As soon as I have a bit of time I will go through the hundred of previous post in which you say and repeated those dogmas.

Have a good day.  

As usual, you've got nothing but a bunch of empty talk. You didn't even remotely answer the substance of my post. I would say I'm disappointed, but I'm not. I've learned to expect no better from you.

Got evidence?

No? That makes you nothing but a deluded crank.