(April 17, 2011 at 2:38 pm)Cinjin Cain Wrote:(April 17, 2011 at 12:45 am)Zen Badger Wrote: [quote='Cinjin Cain' pid='127961' dateline='1302812935']
Quote:Zen, although I clearly disagree with you, I still respect your right to lobby against me. That's America. Admittedly, I do hope you don't succeed at helping to take yet another right of mine away.
Where exactly did I say you shouldn't have your guns?
It's your country, you can do what you damn well please.
My point was only that a professional invading army would not by deterred by a bunch (and I'll say it again) of John Wayne wannabes waving their hunting rifles around like it's the wild west.
As to the War of Independence? that was then, this is now. And they were semi professional militias( similar to the National Guard) not random farmers and the like.
Also they were armed similarly to their opponents.
Any invading army has ALREADY defeated the U.S military(the most heavily funded military in the world, bar none).
After the napalm, cluster bombs, long range artillery attacks, the missiles, the massed rocket attacks and chemical drops their biggest problem would hosing your mangled remains out of their tank tracks.
To illustrate a point, this is your home army....
[youtube]StOJr2k5Y-U[/youtube]
your opposition has already beaten this...
[youtube]PveySa8nH0g[/youtube]
Reality check please.....
@ RJ, as was pointed out to my company when I was in the Australian Army Reserves. The sole intent of a gun is to kill, nothing else(this point was made by our sergeant, a professional soldier).
So when lots of devices whose designed purpose is to kill are held by lots of people whose I.Q can be measured on the fingers of one hand, expect consequences.
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif)
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.