That's odd...I thought we were a nation of laws?

[GODZILLA]

Or does that not matter when you have the magic R next to your name? I have said it time and time after time and i will say it again; this man is getting some dangerous ideas in his head
Trump: Deport without 'judges or court cases'

[Foxaèr]

404 Page Not Found

[GODZILLA]

404 Page Not Found

Try again sorry about that

[Minimalist]

I'm sure he was referring to this blast of brain diarrhea from the Orange Shitgibbon.

https://www.usnews.com/news/top-news/art...ourt-cases

Trump Says Illegal Immigrants Should Be Deported With 'No Judges or Court Cases'

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald Trump said on Sunday that people who enter the United States illegally should be sent back immediately to where they came from without any judicial process, likening them to invaders who are trying to "break into" the country.

[Cecelia]

The same people who will argue that rights are 'god given' will argue that people not born in the US don't deserve those 'god given' rights.  Funny how that works.

[RoadRunner79]

The same people who will argue that rights are 'god given' will argue that people not born in the US don't deserve those 'god given' rights.  Funny how that works.

Really? I don’t know anyone who argues that!

[Losty]

The same people who will argue that rights are 'god given' will argue that people not born in the US don't deserve those 'god given' rights.  Funny how that works.

Really?   I don’t know anyone who argues that!

You must not get out much.

[Minimalist]

The same people who will argue that rights are 'god given' will argue that people not born in the US don't deserve those 'god given' rights.  Funny how that works.

Really?   I don’t know anyone who argues that!

I don't think he gets out at all.

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyath...amendment/

Bryan Fischer: Only Christianity is Protected Under the First Amendment

You really should put the fucking bible down and catch up on current events, RR.

[RoadRunner79]

Really?   I don’t know anyone who argues that!

You must not get out much.

I like to think that I expose myself to varying points of view (I'm here aren't I).

However I don't see people saying that those outside of the U.S.  don't deserve those rights described in the constitution as inalienable and given by creator.   The very phrasing, is meant to describe something which is not given by, but only recognized by the governing body.  

We can talk about immigration policy, and if they should be changed.  I don't think that unrestricted immigration is a good idea, and that we should have laws concerning immigration (most countries I believe do).  And really what is being talked about is those who circumvent proper immigration procedures.   I would say that for the majority of people, it is dishonest to try to ascribe to them, that having immigration restrictions as equal to them saying that others don't deserve basic human rights.  If you are arguing that these countries are such shit holes, then do you think that those left in those countries don't deserve these rights as well? Should we start over throwing governments in these places?

---

Really?   I don’t know anyone who argues that!

I don't think he gets out at all.

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyath...amendment/

Bryan Fischer: Only Christianity is Protected Under the First Amendment

Do you know this person, or did you cherry pick the internet; to find one example that suits your purposes?  
Again, I would say, I don't know anyone who would agree that "people not born in the US don't deserve those 'god given' rights"

[The Industrial Atheist]

You must not get out much.

I like to think that I expose myself to varying points of view (I'm here aren't I).

However I don't see people saying that those outside of the U.S.  don't deserve those rights described in the constitution as inalienable and given by creator.   The very phrasing, is meant to describe something which is not given by, but only recognized by the governing body.  

We can talk about immigration policy, and if they should be changed.  I don't think that unrestricted immigration is a good idea, and that we should have laws concerning immigration (most countries I believe do).  And really what is being talked about is those who circumvent proper immigration procedures.   I would say that for the majority of people, it is dishonest to try to ascribe to them, that having immigration restrictions as equal to them saying that others don't deserve basic human rights.  If you are arguing that these countries are such shit holes, then do you think that those left in those countries don't deserve these rights as well? Should we start over throwing governments in these places?

I'm not trying to be a douche, but that was sort of the argument for holding people indefinitely without trial at Guantanamo Bay and Abu Graibh. Of course, that wasn't enough so they had to go with the enemy combatants thing.