A challenge to Statler Waldorf

[KichigaiNeko]

Let's suppose, for the sake of argument, that we concede your proposition "atheism is a religion".

What's the point? What would that demonstrate?

I'd imagine it would make the religious idiots feel better in the sense that as most Atheists are against religion (at the very least against what it is built on (a faith in a god)) they feel it would discredit our arguments against their religion if we were part of a religion ourselves.

But that's just a guess and obviously not even an issue as Atheism is not a religion, not at any stretch of the imagination and just makes the people arguing that it is seem even more ignorant than they already are.

Is it just me but does the whole "Atheism is a religion" accusations are coming from religious people who (generally) ARE religious and are totally incapable of thinking any other way???

Just a thought