A challenge to Statler Waldorf

[Shell B]

If atheism is really not a religion then why should atheists enjoy the same religious freedoms as actual religions? Can’t have your cake and eat it too, I am sorry.
Well I am sure you are aware that Secular Humanism was developed by atheists, so not really sure what your point is there. The fact of the matter is that the court in Wisconsin DID conclude atheism was a religion and the Supreme Court DID conclude that religions do not require a belief in a supreme being in order to be classified as religions. You can ignore these facts all you want, but it does not dimension the validity of my argument any.

Of course you will go on an off-topic tangent and fail to produce the quote that you obviously lied about.

Wrong, not all Christians agree on the Christian Narrative, some believe the Earth is old, some believe it is young, some believe God used Evolution, but most do not. I would challenge you to find any atheists who do not believe that life on earth evolved through natural means. Nice try.

You, of course, missed the point. All Christians are followers of the Bible. I have never met one atheist who thinks an atheist's book is the word of a supreme being.

Ahh but you have still read it? Not surprising at all, and unless you were raised by illiterate natives in the jungles of South America you were heavily indoctrinated with Darwinian Theory from grade school on. Try and be honest here.

Ugh. Your grammar. I hate it. Anyway, reading something and learning a theory are different from being indoctrinated.

The fact you are having difficulties keeping up is irrelevant to the validity of my argument.

You think I am having problems "keeping up?" Why don't you stay on topic and state your opinions and "facts" clearly?

Doesn’t matter, not all Christians are interested in evangelism, but most of their leaders are just like the atheistic leaders like Dawkins and Hitchens.

They are writers, not leaders.

He was attacked by individuals. There are a ton of those when it comes to atheism.

Ok, so you do what YOU think is right, that is moral relativism so thanks for proving that point for me. Now if we went through what you think is right I can guarantee it could be traced back to Judeo-Christian ethics. So thanks again.

Way to pretend you were making a different point than you were trying to make. I do what I think is right, not some douche you think is a leader.

Sure there were people who didn’t believe in God even before Christianity, but these people were not part of the atheist religion. The Atheist religion is very young as far as religions go.

There is no atheist religion. Stop being obtuse.

What are you? 13?

Oh, that old schtick. How cute.

Nope but scientists, the judicial system and historians would, and they are who decides what officially counts as a religion or not, try and keep up, I know it’s hard.

You still haven't proven that the judicial system thinks that atheism is a religion. You pulled a bullshit quote out of your ass. I read the findings of the judge in that matter and your bullshit quote was nowhere to be found. Try not to be dishonest and I will try to "keep up" with your obviously superior intellect.

I hold the positive believe that fairies do not exist, I affirm their non-existence. Just like you hold positive belief that God does not exist. Do you not read what I write?

As much as it pains me, I do read the drivel that you post.

Non- sequitur, just because Stalin didn’t define one thing correctly in no way means he defined everything incorrectly. Stalin defined atheism the exact same way you do, I am sorry if that makes your religion look bad but you will learn to live with it.

I do not have a religion, but I hope all the child rapists in yours make you look bad. Oh, and the murderers and those who force children to wage war against their own countrymen. I just love what your religion has done to Africa.