RE: A challenge to Statler Waldorf
April 19, 2011 at 10:35 pm
(This post was last modified: April 19, 2011 at 10:37 pm by Shell B.)
(April 18, 2011 at 9:33 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: If atheism is really not a religion then why should atheists enjoy the same religious freedoms as actual religions? Can’t have your cake and eat it too, I am sorry.
Why should religious people have rights that others do not?
(April 18, 2011 at 9:33 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: the Supreme Court DID conclude that religions do not require a belief in a supreme being in order to be classified as religions. You can ignore these facts all you want, but it does not dimension the validity of my argument any.
You have failed to produce that finding. I'm not ignoring facts. I am requesting that you produce one that is verifiable and not made up.
(April 18, 2011 at 9:33 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Everything I said was completely true and you have done nothing to demonstrate otherwise goober.
Actually, I did. I stated that I read the findings of that case and the part that you "quoted" is not in there. Unless you produce that quote, I must assume that I did demonstrate that you were falsifying information, goober.
(April 18, 2011 at 9:33 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Can you name one Reformed Christian who has raped, murdered, or forced a child to wage war? I doubt it. Yeah those poor people being murdered in the Sudan….wait….those are Christians! Can you really be that naïve?
"Reformed" or not, you are a Christian, as is Joseph Kony. I'll wait for you to google it.
I did not mention Sudan. Oh, and the people being murdered in Darfur are not all Christians or all Muslims. Just google Shelly Barclay and Darfur. I am sure the number of articles that returns and their content will give you an idea of the amount of research I have done on that topic, just in case you sincerely think I am naive. You know what, I will make it easy for you. Click here.
