Only a theist could take a paradoxically absurd mystery and propose an even greater absurdity is the obvious answer.
When you have actual evidence of a God, Chad, then you can talk. In the final analysis you have an imaginary puzzle piece that supposedly fits a poorly understood puzzle. These 'arguments' you bandy about are only convincing to the desperate and weak-minded.
When you have actual evidence of a God, Chad, then you can talk. In the final analysis you have an imaginary puzzle piece that supposedly fits a poorly understood puzzle. These 'arguments' you bandy about are only convincing to the desperate and weak-minded.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)
