(June 5, 2016 at 9:56 am)ChadWooters Wrote:(June 5, 2016 at 12:12 am)Maelstrom Wrote: I wonder why that is.
MY POINT EXACTLY! Maybe if you were less biased against the theistic AF members you would direct your snipes toward Equilax and Jor. They, not me, are suggesting that non-existent things can cause change. Nevertheless, should I take your comment as tacit agreement that common everyday observations can serve as evidence, observations such as "only actual things cause change."
I dunno there was always a bias against theists for as long as their religion existed. It's like so
back then you couldn't say i don't believe in your god(s) you would get killed for that. Now in this era
you could get killed but for the most part you would get shunned. To put it like so why do you need god for anything
the universe came about in naturalistic means heck we found the building blocks for life already. You can get life from
non life given the right circumstances.
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-29368984
Life - it's just interstellar chemistry at it's finest.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>