(June 5, 2016 at 1:51 pm)dyresand Wrote:(June 5, 2016 at 1:14 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Yes, but something was still needed to make that first life happen.
Life didn't just spontaneously start to exist. It evolved from something else that was already there. And that thing came from another thing. And so on and so forth. In nature, as we know it, everything comes from something. As far as we know, things don't begin to exist out of nowhere and from nothing at all. So if you believe there wasn't any sort of supernatural element to the beginning of the first particle of the first natural thing to ever have existed, that is totally fine, but you are still putting your faith on something we have no understanding of and no explanation for.
You don't really need something CL you really don't.
to put it like so under the right conditions you can get life from non life this experiment is proof of that.
you can even google it and look up the results for yourself. Considering this is pretty embarrassing this is the year 2016 we
should have moved on from religious beliefs and moved on into a much more modern science based society by now.
As I explained, I know you can get life from non life. I accept evolution. But it still came from something, even though that something was non living. It didn't spontaneously appear from no force or no matter at all.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh