(June 5, 2016 at 7:00 pm)dyresand Wrote:(June 5, 2016 at 6:48 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: And yes, if you say "maybe nature was somehow different back then", you're still putting your faith on that.
Uh.. yeah the world was different way back in the day when it was forming it and the further you dig down you can see the evidence of that.
You don't need to default onto faith to know the world was different a few million and more years ago. The planet at a point was much more volcanic active
and would have looked like this.
With science you don't need faith you need evidence. And being wrong is science is a good thing its better to be proven wrong
with evidence. Hawken was proven wrong he didn't get upset he just moved on and thought about a better theory. And said theory
pretty much solved the information paradox with black holes.
Context, Dyer.
I wasn't referring to the world being different. I was referring to the basic laws of nature. Particularly, the fact that things and forces all have an origin and all come from something.... and don't materialize from nothing at all.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh