A challenge to Statler Waldorf

[Zen Badger]

---

Again this is, a question for Dr. Smart and the anthropologists who use this system (which is most of them) not me. You are doing nothing to demonstrate how atheism is not a religion though.

And tell me SW, Do ANY of these anthropologists (including Smart) define Atheism as a religion using this system?

(I was going to refute your post point by point but then decided I can't be arsed)

---

Anthropology is usually more concerned with the older religions, so I do not know whether they do or not. That would be another question for them, not me. Certainly would be a religion using their system though.

So, in other words they don't. So much for your argument then.

Oh so you were going to refute me but decided against it? Talk is cheap. I guess I should have responded to your challenge with, “I was going to demonstrate beyond a shadow of doubt that atheism is a religion but decided not to waste my time.”

Since you have signally failed to do so, you have rather wasted your time after all.