Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 4, 2025, 5:01 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
An Old Science book from 1650
#14
RE: An Old Science book from 1650
Quote: You know what though, I sometimes like to look at history with the idea that humans haven't changed that much.

But their thinking has.

This quote from Frederick the Great is amusing....

If my soldiers were to begin to think, not one of them would remain in the army.

but probably false.  In the 1750's it was just one more way to die and at least you got paid and didn't have to work in the fields.  Those wounded in battle stood an excellent chance of dying from infection but the same was true of some farmer who got his foot run over by a wagon.  As Abs said, death was a constant presence.  I always found this chart to be instructive.

[Image: le01.gif]

Between infant mortality, death in child birth, plagues and infections the basic life expectancy hardly changed throughout the millennia...until very recently when science developed anti-biotics and sanitation and germ theory.

In the 20th century people started to think that they did not have to die of the first bug that came along.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
An Old Science book from 1650 - by Fake Messiah - June 9, 2016 at 6:13 am
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by Little lunch - June 9, 2016 at 6:43 am
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by ignoramus - June 9, 2016 at 7:28 am
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by Exian - June 9, 2016 at 8:40 am
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by abaris - June 9, 2016 at 2:27 pm
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by Exian - June 9, 2016 at 4:42 pm
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by Minimalist - June 9, 2016 at 12:17 pm
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by TubbyTubby - June 9, 2016 at 2:13 pm
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by Minimalist - June 9, 2016 at 2:19 pm
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by Aoi Magi - June 9, 2016 at 3:03 pm
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by AkiraTheViking - June 9, 2016 at 7:55 pm
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by ignoramus - June 9, 2016 at 8:04 pm
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by AkiraTheViking - June 9, 2016 at 10:33 pm
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by Minimalist - June 9, 2016 at 11:29 pm
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by ignoramus - June 10, 2016 at 2:03 am
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by abaris - June 10, 2016 at 3:52 am
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by Jackalope - June 10, 2016 at 2:47 am
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by ignoramus - June 10, 2016 at 3:05 am
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by Jackalope - June 10, 2016 at 3:16 am
RE: An Old Science book from 1650 - by ignoramus - June 10, 2016 at 3:25 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Once Again - Science Does Stuff While Religitards Read Their Silly Old Books! Minimalist 6 1410 March 8, 2016 at 3:59 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Bug-killing book pages clean murky drinking water zebo-the-fat 6 2039 August 17, 2015 at 2:43 pm
Last Post: Kitty Galore
Thumbs Up Book Recommendations Brometheus 4 1680 April 1, 2015 at 11:45 am
Last Post: SteelCurtain
  Map proves Portuguese discovered Australia: new book pocaracas 15 5694 February 20, 2013 at 6:48 am
Last Post: The Magic Pudding
  Christian school text book teaches Loch Ness Monster real. downbeatplumb 30 11790 June 26, 2012 at 7:18 pm
Last Post: Oldandeasilyconfused
  New Hardcover Evolution Book Based Upon Junior Skeptic Gawdzilla 3 1284 October 3, 2011 at 2:19 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  The science behind why people reject science Kaptinjoo 6 2979 April 27, 2011 at 2:49 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  Critique of new creationist book on "Origins" Secularone 3 2086 November 3, 2009 at 6:20 am
Last Post: fr0d0
  Darwin Audio Book (Read by Dawkins) Kyuuketsuki 4 3525 May 14, 2009 at 6:30 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet



Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)