(June 10, 2016 at 7:11 am)Constable Dorfl Wrote:Never said therefore GOD, and you have proven nothing whatsoever.popsthebuilder Wrote:I get why people try to seperate nature from GOD. And why they act as if science is apart from GOD. But logically, they all go together just fine.
No they don't the study of scientific disciplines had steadily decreased the amount of things that god was supposed to control. Jupiter/thor/taranis etc. were all supposed to control thunder and lightning; now we know they are both products of a single natural process. Yhwh was supposed to contol gravity, nade the animals from dust separste from each other and have enough power to drown the whole world. For the first we know it is a bending of spacetime by sufficiently massive bodies, for the second, we know all current species evolved by genetics, epigenetics and natural selection and we are getting closer to a near definitive answer on the process of abiogenesis. And for the flood we know that was impossible. There two good examples of religion flatly conteadicting science.
Quote:Just because something is beyond scientific understanding(supernatural) doesn't mean it is contrary to scientific understanding per say, or even not natural.
Problem is, pops, you asserting a truth position doesn't make it true, just as if I said I were 6'6" (I'm not, about5'5"). So to have us accept the truth position of your assertion, you'll have to show us sufficient evidence, which is, emphatically, not you saying "religion doesn't contradict science, therefore god", a statement I have proven false.
You speak of Thor and yah, neither of which have much to do with the topic at hand.
If you can't accept that scriptures of the faithful expressly condone science then that's your own willful bias and ignorance.
By the way; the laws that bind nature, regardless of how well we can describe them, still came from a source we cannot test in any scientific manner, and chance can't be proven in any way.
Faith in selfless Unity for Good.