How thick is Matt Slick?

[SteveII]

Logic is the system or framework organized according to strict principles of validity. It is not a process. It is a noun (unlike thinking, pondering, etc.). You are equivocating between how someone arrives at a logical conclusion and the logical conclusion. Someone could arrive at a logical conclusion without thinking or pondering at all or entirely by accident. Omniscience substitutes for pondering and thinking with the same result: logical conclusion. 
You are also introducing an temporal component to the mind of God. Successive thoughts are temporal events. Is God bound by time? 
Straw man: You used the word "pondering" and then knocked it over with "why would God need to ponder if he already knows everything?"

I don't think you have a clue what you're talking about. You just said that "process" is not a noun.  You've been wrong, then wrong, then wrong again, you're wrong about this and I'm not even going to bother addressing the rest of your post because you did not tell me whether parallel lines cross. Hell, who am I kidding, even if you did go down that road you're still never going to admit you're wrong about anything because apologists don't do that.

First, I did not say that process is not a noun. Read it again. "It" in each of those sentences is "logic". The sentences are not connected in any other way then their subjects are the same. You have YET to show me how I was wrong in anything.

I did not get to your question about parallel lines because I didn't even address your second point yet about logic being a human invention. I started typing that but stopped when I saw this ridiculous post. 

If you don't want to continue, fine. 

BTW, parallel lines do not intersect.