This movie really represents the low of the low the "Hollywood" has come. They're really beating a dead horse with this movie. Not only is it lazy writing with just rehashing old material but the the ugly PR propaganda Sony is pushing. They are actually threatening Bill Murray to promote and like this movie in public! It was outed in wikileakes email:
From: Steinberg, David
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 3:06 PM
To: Venger, Leonard; Weil, Leah
Cc: Yankelevits, Daniel
Subject: Ghostbusters/Murray - Litigation Counsel [CONFIDENTIAL]
In order to more fully evaluate our position if Bill Murray again declines to engage on “Ghostbusters”, AG requested that we identify “aggressive” litigation counsel with whom we can consult to evaluate our alternatives and strategize. [Harkening back to his prior employer, of course, raised the name of David Boies.]
Personally, while I’m fine with aggressive, I think we are in much worse shape if this goes public so seems to me we should look for someone who isn’t seeking the spotlight.
Can we discuss at some point soon to provide a suggestion or two?
Thanks.
https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/104704
I mean just look at what happened at "Kimmel", they're acting as if people are displeased because it's all female cast and then there's this clip, where they show the awful clip from the movie after which Murray is totally disgusted and then forces a smile:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl...Z0YexsRCPc
![[Image: 41RH7F5.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.imgur.com%2F41RH7F5.jpg)
From: Steinberg, David
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 3:06 PM
To: Venger, Leonard; Weil, Leah
Cc: Yankelevits, Daniel
Subject: Ghostbusters/Murray - Litigation Counsel [CONFIDENTIAL]
In order to more fully evaluate our position if Bill Murray again declines to engage on “Ghostbusters”, AG requested that we identify “aggressive” litigation counsel with whom we can consult to evaluate our alternatives and strategize. [Harkening back to his prior employer, of course, raised the name of David Boies.]
Personally, while I’m fine with aggressive, I think we are in much worse shape if this goes public so seems to me we should look for someone who isn’t seeking the spotlight.
Can we discuss at some point soon to provide a suggestion or two?
Thanks.
https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/104704
I mean just look at what happened at "Kimmel", they're acting as if people are displeased because it's all female cast and then there's this clip, where they show the awful clip from the movie after which Murray is totally disgusted and then forces a smile:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl...Z0YexsRCPc
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
