How thick is Matt Slick?

[Esquilax]

[1] I agree with the above statement. God does not "invoke logic" defined as an analytical process ( I have said the exact same thing a dozen time). As you pointed out his omniscience allows him to skip this step. However that in no way means that all conclusions God has are not logical (of or pertaining to logic). Your leap to God has no need of logic is unfounded.

1. Logical conclusions are derived from either a) the process of logically analyzing assumptions or b) having omniscience.
2. God has omniscience
3. God's conclusions are logical

[2] I was going to say something, but nevermind, it wont matter.

How did you determine 1b, again?

Couldn't you be omniscient and still fundamentally irrational? Like, if you had personal biases that influenced the conclusions you drew from your omniscience? What if you were insane? Hell, what if you weren't actually omniscient, but just thought that you were?

I'd say this was a problem with drawing logical arguments without any means of determining the premises, but I don't even think that's what you're doing here. Your complete lack of even attempted justification suggests that you're just saying things out of convenience, because I know you're smart enough not to think these assertions actually count for anything on their own.