How thick is Matt Slick?

[Nihilist Virus]

Once again, Google "Continuum hypothesis" and tell me if the set in question exists. It's a proposition which has been shown to be undecidable. In other words, it's a true/false issue which cannot be shown to be either.

The proposition, by the way, is this:

There is no set X such that |Z|<|X|<|R|.

Suppose the set in question exists. Then God knows what the set is. Enumerating the set reveals its cardinality and constitutes the proof that the set exists.

Suppose the set in question does not exist. But God, by his omniscience, is aware of every set that exists and can arrange them by their cardinality. This constitutes an exhaustive proof that the set in question does not exist.

But it's already been proven that there is no proof regardless of if the proposition is true or false.

So if God is omniscient then he necessarily violates logic with some of his knowledge. In other words, his knowledge, in this instance, cannot be "logical" because the knowledge itself violates logic.

You are inescapably wrong.