I think a fundamentalist by definition must believe every word the bible says in every book. A non fundamentalist picks and chooses what he wants to believe. If they don't understand what the chapter or verse is talking about , it isn't true. If they don't like the way a particular verse makes them feel, they rationalize it away, because it cant be true. Problem is, If you pick out a specific part that you don't like and discard it, then how can you tell the difference between truth and bs in the rest of the bible. I consider myself a fundamentalist in the sense that I believe what the bible has written in it. But I don't fit you guys stereotype of hating people that aren't like me. I see it like this, If you hired a plumber and he told you he didn't know the fundamentals of plumbing, would you let him fix your toilet? Would you even consider him a "true" plumber? I don't view the bible as a science book at all. To the believer, its a spiritual road map, that's about it. To comment on an earlier discussion, Im not a science denier. I think science is the method to break down into parts how Gods creation works. I fail to see how you disprove God by discovering how natural phenomenon operates.
Islam has killed millions in the last decade, lets focus all attention on Christianity!
