And No, The Term "Terrorist"

[paulpablo]

White people are so so civilized ! they never -ever- carry on terrorism!
When a white person burns people from a UAV (Drone), it's so civilizied, liberal, democratic  !
But when brown people burn with IEDs (Improved Explisive devices), they are terrorist savages who should be nuked ! NUKE THEM !!

A white person shoots 30 people inside the movies ? it's okay, poor him is crazy, sick..
A brown Muslim shoots 30 people inside a bar? NUKE THE MUSLIM WORLD ! BROWN MONKEYS !!!!

1) I established that there are very well known and reported about white terrorist individuals and groups in my last post, including some Muslim ones.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samantha_Lewthwaite

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/cri...87676.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_t...rmy_of_God

And it's not the case that these people aren't called terrorists or sympathized with by other white people in the mainstream media.

2) How many liberals do you speak to who are in favor of drone killings?

3) It's not the mainstream media that even remotely suggests nuking the Muslim world that I've noticed anyway.

4) The example of white people shooting theaters and Muslims shooting gay clubs is pretty fairly and equally represented.
Considering the fact that the victims of white mass shooters are usually other white people.  So you can't expect people to say "This white person shot some white people, in retribution for this we should kill white people." 
Whereas people having an illogical knee jerk reaction to a Muslim shooting up a homosexual nightclub by saying something of the lines of "Let's kill those Muslims." Is obviously a more likely a logical scenario.  I'm not saying killing Muslims in retaliation is logical, just to clarify.  I'm saying the scenario of someone else saying that is more logical than someone saying "A white guy shot some white people so lets kill those white people."
The two aren't comparable situations in the way you've presented them.