RE: Hilary so incompetent State Dept spam filters were blocking her correspondence
June 30, 2016 at 10:46 am
(This post was last modified: June 30, 2016 at 11:18 am by CapnAwesome.)
(June 30, 2016 at 4:28 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(June 30, 2016 at 1:13 am)CapnAwesome Wrote: She hasn't made any decisions yet. So we don't know what she might do with LGBT rights. We do know it's probably not a priority for her though, considering that she has only supported marriage equality for a few years. If she had to make a deal on gay rights with a Republican congress in order to pass some bill or another, do you really think she's going to stand up for the LGBT community or is she more interested in advancing causes she's cared about for her whole career? On the other hand she's been committed to bombing middle eastern countries pretty much her whole life.
Tell us again why you think that self-correcting is bad. I find "I was wrong" much more refreshing than "I'm the Donald, I'm right no matter the facts."
As for bombing Middle Eastern countries, I'm not in accord with some of her foreign policy positions. But I'm not sure there's a better alternative on the ballot ... maybe you could help me out there? Last I checked, Trump was pretty cool with dropping nukes in Syria ... yet you're oddly silent about that.
Your mileage may vary. Objects in the mirror are smaller than they appear too.
Hillary is cool with dropping nukes too.
http://www.antiwar.com/solomon/?articleid=10808
http://www.globalresearch.ca/hillary-cli...le/5494380
So was Obama. In various debates they both have said that 'no options are off the table.' Every major presidential candidate in the last 50 years has said the same thing and every year someone brings it up against the candidate they don't like as though it's some terrible and unique position. It's really a non issue. This isn't my first rodeo and I pay attention to this stuff and remember. Besides, why is Donald Trump's nuke position being brought up in a discussion about whether Hillary will stick to her support about LGBT rights? It's not about changing positions, it's about how much commitment she has to those positions. I don't believe that Hillary cares about a position she barely has held. Presidents aren't dictators, they have to prioritize what they can get done. Obviously gay rights aren't a priority for Hillary.
Also, why even bring up Donald Trump and nukes as a reply to Hillary's position on LGBT rights? I don't support Trump and I'm not voting for him. Could it be that the best selling point for Clinton is fear mongering over Trump? In that case your cadidate sucks.