I feel a bit relieved.

[Angrboda]

I present to the ladies and gedderbong of the court that the defendant chose to deflect with red herrings rather than actually address the question.

I presented many challenges to you guys and every time you back off in fear
for the simple reason that you haven't got the slightest clue about these important issues.  

I presented the issue of philosophy.
I presented the issue of evolution.
I presented the issue of whether progress existed in this finite universe just to mention few and every time you fail to come up with anything that make any sense.

If I could present these arguments to a jury of independent people the verdict
would be disastrous for you guys.
It would kill you and I don't want that after all we all have been dreamers in the past.
Let us just hope that granny was correct in saying that is never too late to learn.  

That's right, the people here are conspiring to disagree with you. We're not independent. You're full of excuses. As I said before, it's not a matter of whether we can respond to your satisfaction to your loaded questions that determines whether your case has merit, it's the balance of evidence that you can bring for your worldview. In that department you've failed completely. The best evidence you have are a small handful of unexplained veridical NDEs. The rest is a bunch of analogies and bare assertions from you, which don't mean shit. Your poking holes in someone else's explanation, even if successful, doesn't count one lick toward vindicating your own. On that measure you've been a total loser. And your previous post to me is indicative of the type of trash that your arguments consist of, being nothing more than unofficial opinion pieces. You link to health nut websites and other extremists whose views don't count for shit. You wouldn't know good evidence if it reached up and bit you. So where's your evidence for reincarnation? For microvita? For karma? Where's your evidence that consciousness is intangible?