I feel a bit relieved.

[Angrboda]

That's right, the people here are conspiring to disagree with you.  We're not independent.  You're full of excuses.  As I said before, it's not a matter of whether we can respond to your satisfaction to your loaded questions that determines whether your case has merit, it's the balance of evidence that you can bring for your worldview.  In that department you've failed completely.  The best evidence you have are a small handful of unexplained veridical NDEs.  The rest is a bunch of analogies and bare assertions from you, which don't mean shit.  Your poking holes in someone else's explanation, even if successful, doesn't count one lick toward vindicating your own.  On that measure you've been a total loser.  And your previous post to me is indicative of the type of trash that your arguments consist of, being nothing more than unofficial opinion pieces.  You link to health nut websites and other extremists whose views don't count for shit.  You wouldn't know good evidence if it reached up and bit you.  So where's your evidence for reincarnation?  For microvita?  For karma?  Where's your evidence that consciousness is intangible?

Your dishonesty has no limits yog.  

1) NDEs come by the hundreds not by ........ a small handful.........

Do you know what a veridical NDE is? Of course you don't. Otherwise you wouldn't say there are hundreds. A veridical NDE is one for which some of the elements of the NDE can't be explained as events all "happening inside the head." There aren't hundreds of those, there's only a few.

"Veridical near-death experiences are NDEs in which people reportedly out-of-body have observed events or gathered information that was verified by others upon the experiencer’s return to a conscious state."
http://iands.org/ndes/about-ndes/key-nde...ml?start=2

2) Has already been established that with the brain devoid of flowing blood and oxygen it could not possibly create visions and experiences.

Bullshit. It has not been 'established' by anybody. Much less by you.

3) These experiences lead to the same conclusion which is one more reason to believe them.

Now you're just a liar. I've posted about hellish NDEs and ones from Indian nationals that differ from your tales about God and so on. There is considerable difference among NDEs among different cultures. You 'explaining' it with bare assertions and analogies doesn't make it otherwise.

4) Reincarnation, microvita and karma are all back up by the countless of people who had and NDE.

Now you're completely full of shit. They provide no evidence for reincarnation, microvita, or karma. Obviously you don't actually have any evidence for these things. That's just sad. Your whole worldview dependent on a mere interpretation of NDEs. That's just sickening.

On top of that they make a lot of sense while to believe that with the physical death is all over doesn't.
In this case there wouldn't be justice and the law of positive and negative wouldn't exit but it does very well.

This is just wishful thinking. You may find it desirable that there be justice and that when you're dead it's not all over, but you not wanting that to be true doesn't make it not true. It only 'makes sense' to you because you can't accept any other result. You're addicted to your own fantasy of what you want life to be. That says nothing about how life actually is. And again you have no evidence. That something 'makes sense' to you isn't proof that it is true. That's the lowest bar on the ladder of evidence. It doesn't count for shit because a million other explanations also 'make sense' of the data.