(July 6, 2016 at 12:45 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(July 6, 2016 at 12:42 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Lol, RR, and the argument would be chock-full of logical fallacies if you were to do that. And the sad thing is you KNOW that because it's been explained to you over and over. But, by all means. ::
How can the same arguments be chock-full of fallacies in one instance, and legitimate in the next? But that is the point.... thanks.
Um...Because religion and evolution are fundamentally different things, so you can't apply the same blanket arguments to both and expect the same effectiveness?
Come on, RR. You've been around here for far too long to play this stupid.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
