Does a God exist?

[GrandizerII]

You have a bunch of circumstantial evidence.  So do they.  Both cases are weak.  I've yet to see a difference.

You are comparing apples and oranges.I don't think it is reasonable to think the NT authors were simply mistaken (as there is ample reasons to think UFO people are)--especially with the additional evidence of the existing churches. The only plausible explanation of the contents being false is intentional deception. That would have been quite an undertaken and I think we would need to answer the question why?

This is how you sound to me:

I'm not going to accept that the arguments I usually make for testimonies or reports of extraordinary events should apply to the testimonies or reports of the extraordinary events that I myself have committed to accepting as true no matter what ... because Jesus.