Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 29, 2025, 2:29 pm
Atheist Forums › Discussion › News & Current Affairs v
Thanks, but.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Thanks, but.
abaris Offline
Posting Freak
*****
Religious Views: agnostic
Posts: 13122
Threads: 130
Joined: October 18, 2014
Reputation: 55
#17
RE: Thanks, but.
July 10, 2016 at 1:12 pm
(July 10, 2016 at 1:09 pm)Minimalist Wrote: The problem is it would set a precedent for future congresses to investigate him when his term was over.

Compared to his predecessor he's got no skeleton in the closet. He had two years when the Democrats actually had a majority. A republican congress won't start or sanction any investigation going against one of their own. And I'm not sure if it would be any different if the roles were reversed.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Discussion › News & Current Affairs v
Thanks, but.

Messages In This Thread
Thanks, but. - by Minimalist - July 10, 2016 at 1:33 am
RE: Thanks, but. - by purplepurpose - July 10, 2016 at 2:10 am
RE: Thanks, but. - by Losty - July 10, 2016 at 2:17 am
RE: Thanks, but. - by purplepurpose - July 10, 2016 at 2:28 am
RE: Thanks, but. - by downbeatplumb - July 10, 2016 at 4:47 am
RE: Thanks, but. - by ignoramus - July 10, 2016 at 4:19 am
RE: Thanks, but. - by Thumpalumpacus - July 10, 2016 at 4:51 am
RE: Thanks, but. - by abaris - July 10, 2016 at 5:05 am
RE: Thanks, but. - by Thumpalumpacus - July 10, 2016 at 11:45 am
RE: Thanks, but. - by Minimalist - July 10, 2016 at 11:51 am
RE: Thanks, but. - by abaris - July 10, 2016 at 12:03 pm
RE: Thanks, but. - by account_inactive - July 10, 2016 at 1:50 pm
RE: Thanks, but. - by Minimalist - July 10, 2016 at 12:06 pm
RE: Thanks, but. - by abaris - July 10, 2016 at 12:09 pm
RE: Thanks, but. - by Minimalist - July 10, 2016 at 12:56 pm
RE: Thanks, but. - by abaris - July 10, 2016 at 1:02 pm
RE: Thanks, but. - by Minimalist - July 10, 2016 at 1:09 pm
RE: Thanks, but. - by abaris - July 10, 2016 at 1:12 pm
RE: Thanks, but. - by Minimalist - July 10, 2016 at 1:24 pm
RE: Thanks, but. - by abaris - July 10, 2016 at 2:22 pm
RE: Thanks, but. - by Minimalist - July 10, 2016 at 2:30 pm
RE: Thanks, but. - by abaris - July 10, 2016 at 2:50 pm
RE: Thanks, but. - by Minimalist - July 10, 2016 at 3:51 pm
RE: Thanks, but. - by abaris - July 11, 2016 at 5:08 am
RE: Thanks, but. - by Pat Mustard - July 11, 2016 at 5:05 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  But.. But.... But..... onlinebiker 25 3569 May 6, 2022 at 10:27 am
Last Post: Jehanne
  BREAKING: Loujain Al-Hathloul FREE ! thanks Biden ! WinterHold 24 2953 February 15, 2021 at 7:05 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Staff infection, "No thanks". Brian37 12 2001 December 11, 2018 at 2:35 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  Thanks To The Guardian For This Minimalist 20 2409 September 19, 2018 at 11:53 am
Last Post: I_am_not_mafia
  Norway Says "No Thanks." Minimalist 66 13085 January 18, 2018 at 1:05 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Thanks, Ladies Minimalist 21 3314 April 29, 2016 at 6:26 pm
Last Post: Society
  Nation Thanks Pope for Briefly Bumping Trump from News Pyrrho 3 1433 September 25, 2015 at 9:23 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Thanks for your unwavering support of free will, God! Rampant.A.I. 1 962 June 15, 2014 at 6:38 pm
Last Post: Marsellus Wallace



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)