(July 10, 2016 at 2:30 pm)Minimalist Wrote: But that's why you don't set the precedent. I'm not saying its right. I don't even agree with it because what Bush did was criminal.
But I do understand why you don't cross that bridge.
You know what they say about soldiers not taking any risks? It's their job to take risks. Worse with politicians. Supposed to represent us. No danger whatsoever other than not being able to park their asses on some high paid chair in parliament, congress or whatever the particular house is called. If that's enough to make them poop their pants, I have zero understanding. Only disgust. Even more so, since a solid part of the population would welcome an honest politician wth open arms if they showed some guts in the right moment and really acted in the name of the people.