RE: A challenge to Statler Waldorf
May 5, 2011 at 7:47 pm
(This post was last modified: May 6, 2011 at 6:39 pm by Statler Waldorf.)
(May 5, 2011 at 8:53 am)Zen Badger Wrote: Hi SW, you never did tell us if any professional anthropologists use Smarts "seven dimensions of religion" to define atheism as a religion.
Until you can I'm afraid your argument is vacuous.
Actually your argument doesn't logically follow, but I do not know if any do or not, if they do it still wouldn't make you admit that it is a religion. In 500 years I am quite sure that anthropologists will consider the "New Atheism" movement of the 20th and 21st century a religious movement. It has all the markings of one.
(May 5, 2011 at 7:38 pm)Shell B Wrote:Statler Waldorf Wrote:So you begin to feel like you are talking to a Mormon about Joseph Smith or a Muslim about Muhammad.
Or a Christian about Jesus. Sanctimonious much, dorf?
I see you are still having issues keeping up. So you ARE admitting that origin of life tales are defended with the same vigor by atheists as is Christ by Christians? Thanks for that.