It's clear creationist's arguments against evolution have evolved over the years.
Yet having the tenets of a religion evolve seems to me like another craven ploy to avoid the obvious:
the religion is false, and hammering it after the fact to fit new discoveries falsifies the religion, it doesn't rehabilitate it.
If it was of an omniscient deity it would have been correct in the first place.
Yet having the tenets of a religion evolve seems to me like another craven ploy to avoid the obvious:
the religion is false, and hammering it after the fact to fit new discoveries falsifies the religion, it doesn't rehabilitate it.
If it was of an omniscient deity it would have been correct in the first place.
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
