RE: A challenge to Statler Waldorf
May 6, 2011 at 6:43 pm
(This post was last modified: May 6, 2011 at 6:49 pm by Statler Waldorf.)
(May 5, 2011 at 11:15 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote:waldor Wrote:Actually your argument doesn't logically floow...It's "Flow", not "floow" you shiney little gem you.
You obviously missed the irony there. It was funny because he was calling people stupid and then couldn't spell. I was not calling anyone stupid (and I made a typo not a misspelling like he did), so your point is irrelevant. This is the kind of stuff I have come to expect from you though.
P.S. It is still Noah’s ARK not Noah’s ARC haha.
.
I actually already answered your stupid question. I said I do not know either way, nor do I care because it's a silly question.
(May 6, 2011 at 2:53 pm)Thor Wrote:(May 5, 2011 at 7:34 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: They play off of emotionalism rather than logical thinking, which sadly can be very effective even though it should never be.
Unlike religious believers who NEVER appeal to emotions and ALWAYS use "logical thinking".
"You see... there was this guy who was born of a virgin. And the guy grew up and could walk on water.... and heal the sick with a touch of his hand.... and feed a thousand people with a basket of fish.... and he was executed by the Romans , but three days later he rose up from the dead!"
Huh? The biblical narrative of Jesus' life is not emotionalism, it's narrative. Sure some religious people use emotionalism, and I call them on it as well. Pointing to bad behavior never justifies bad behavior though, I am sorry.