RE: I Love You Enough to Burn You
May 8, 2011 at 9:00 am
(This post was last modified: May 8, 2011 at 9:20 am by fr0d0.)
Good catch Poet 
Meh - I'm out of that game. Ad Hominem, although fun, never qualifies as rational discourse. I guess he wanted out.
No it doesn't speak about materially creating the universe. I have to credit your lack of knowledge of the subject for that misconception.
You then address a material fact: death, with a metaphysical proposition: life after death... again wanting to mix science with non science. An extraordinary leap. Once again... please justify your reasoning to make such an extraordinary claim.
Meh - I'm out of that game. Ad Hominem, although fun, never qualifies as rational discourse. I guess he wanted out.(May 8, 2011 at 4:31 am)Ace Otana Wrote:That doesn't address the statement, so "not really" is inapplicable. So ignoring that.. your statement is correct. Understanding of logic isn't understanding if there is no such thing as logic.(May 8, 2011 at 12:46 am)Watson Wrote: Absolute knowledge of religion =/= understanding of God.
Not really, Watson. If god doesn't exist, then your so called understanding is anything but.
(May 8, 2011 at 4:31 am)Ace Otana Wrote:Being ultimately true, it isn't required to advance, only our understanding advances in regards to it.Quote:Rejected where it should never be suggested, YES. Religion says NOTHING about the universe and makes NO COMMENT which should advance our scientific understanding of it.It doesn't make any advancement in understanding. Also yes it does speak about the universe. God creating it is one.
No it doesn't speak about materially creating the universe. I have to credit your lack of knowledge of the subject for that misconception.
(May 8, 2011 at 4:31 am)Ace Otana Wrote:You constantly state that you don't believe in God because of lack of evidence. List me at least one piece of evidence that you would find convincing, and we can check if that is illogical/ makes an extraordinary claim.Quote:You claim that science makes claims about the metaphysical.No I didn't. Please point out where I made such a claim. Rejecting bullshit is not claiming.
(May 8, 2011 at 4:31 am)Ace Otana Wrote:So your understanding of biology leads you to theorise that reality should include life without death? I personally find that to be fantastic. Somewhere there one of us left the platform.Quote:Why would you think a fantasy reality with no life is preferable?It's not fantasy, Frodo. It stems from our understanding of the biological. Besides, it beats going to either heaven or hell. Once our brains stops functioning, we will cease to exist.
You then address a material fact: death, with a metaphysical proposition: life after death... again wanting to mix science with non science. An extraordinary leap. Once again... please justify your reasoning to make such an extraordinary claim.
(May 8, 2011 at 4:31 am)Ace Otana Wrote: Frodo, you are completely nuts!Ad Hominem. Where's your justification?
