(August 5, 2016 at 5:41 am)purplepurpose Wrote: Material and costs are up to producer's to decide.
Well - this is extremely important. It's easy to ask for something, but if it turns out to be expensive - we'll all have to pay for it. So, tell me - what kind of materials are you imagining they should be using?
(August 5, 2016 at 5:41 am)purplepurpose Wrote: But it will be cheaper for everyone if there will be individual reusable packages.
How so? You do know, that recycling costs money, right? Reusable packaging has to be collected, transported, sorted, cleaned and processed in all sorts of ways, then transported again - that's a heavy financial burden and it's also bad for the environment, due to carbon emissions (because as of now most of our energy still comes from fossil fuels). If it was cheaper to go with reusable stuff - the corporations would already be doing that, because they're very much interested in cutting costs, believe me.
(August 5, 2016 at 5:41 am)purplepurpose Wrote: Nobody will have to throw out plastic and glass bottles, which aren't 100% recycled.
No, we will have to pay for all the stuff I described above. What would be the benefit? Besides letting dumb hippies pretend they're "saving the planet", even though they're doing the exact opposite?
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
