(May 8, 2011 at 6:56 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote: No matter how much I dispised Bush, I would not accuse him of masterminding something like this.
He doesn't really have to be smart or strategic to mastermind something like this. The CIA and his Pentagon psy-ops would do all the planning as he orders them to do this and that.
(May 8, 2011 at 6:56 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote: Rayaan..you just lost a LOT of respect from me with this thread.
Sometimes I gain it, and sometimes I lose it, but ultimately respect is not as important to me than to freely discuss in this forum (regardless of whether you will agree or not).
(May 8, 2011 at 7:22 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Bush COULDN'T mastermind anything.
Or maybe you don't know him too well. He might be stupid in certain things, but this doesn't mean he's not good at keeping secrets.
(May 8, 2011 at 10:30 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: In a false-flag operation, you frame the people you want to attack.
And I think that's exactly what the US did. Bush pinned it on Osama so that he could obtain a greater access to the oil and gas reserves by going to Afghanistan (see this), and then, when the US had a good grip on Afghanistan, Bush diverted his attention to Iraq by using forged documents to show that Iraq had a great deal of uranium ore and also "weapons of mass destruction," which were never found (see this). More reasons to think that this was a false-flag operation: Lie of the Century
