RE: Book of Contradictions: A Challenge
May 9, 2011 at 6:20 pm
(This post was last modified: May 9, 2011 at 6:21 pm by fr0d0.)
(May 9, 2011 at 12:54 pm)Cinjin Cain Wrote: So you're not going to defend any contradiction????See... such wild misinterpretation shows how you get where you are.
(May 9, 2011 at 12:54 pm)Cinjin Cain Wrote: That's fine. It wasn't my challenge - it was yours - posed to me.I'm glad you got that.
(May 9, 2011 at 12:54 pm)Cinjin Cain Wrote: If you want to claim that it's my fault for not going through with it - that's your business, but anyone who reads the entire thread will see that I offered several options to you and than only chose one when you demanded that I choose.Yeah you offered several options when one single example was very clearly requested. But I'm not going to dwell on your inability to follow a single line instruction.
(May 9, 2011 at 12:54 pm)Cinjin Cain Wrote: The contradictions I chose were weak at best - several people pointed that out and yet still, your only response was to their replys. You have succeeded at nothing. You have said nothing. You have proven nothing. If you will not engage the topic, I cannot offer an argument.Again you failed the simple request - to find one example that I would find hard to refute, and preparing a huge get out for yourself into the bargain. I call that the height of cowardice. I happen to have been very busy with only time to dip into the forum today. I still don't have time left to dedicate any time to this... but then the challenge said nothing of speed... so that's three fails you made so far on interpretation. It's not surprising given your lack of ability in interpreting something I guess.
(May 9, 2011 at 12:54 pm)Cinjin Cain Wrote: How that constitutes defeating me in your own mind - none of us can ever know.Maybe 4? ...no, a conclusion of the 1st 3.