RE: Book of Contradictions: A Challenge
May 11, 2011 at 1:20 pm
(This post was last modified: May 11, 2011 at 2:17 pm by Cinjin.)
(May 11, 2011 at 1:02 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Your exegesis is based on the english translation CC, and not the actual meaning of the text in context. As such it's pretty worthless. Maybe that's why you feel the need to back it up with several ad hominems.
Exegesis: an interpretation, especially of Scripture, that expresses the interpreter's own ideas, bias, or the like, rather than the meaning of the text
The only person interpreting what the scriptures are saying is you. I'm quoting it word for word without interpretation or redefinition. Joe Schmoe off the street and the MILLIONS like him are going to read the bible for what it says. And what it says is that god rested and later says god does not tire. I would refer you to Min's earlier post .... spin how you want to ... it's a contradiction.
EDIT: See follow up posts from Nimzo and myself for WRONG definition. (Actually, correct definition, wrong TERM)