RE: Book of Contradictions: A Challenge
May 12, 2011 at 12:37 am
(This post was last modified: May 12, 2011 at 1:06 am by Godscreated.)
(May 11, 2011 at 1:57 pm)Cinjin Cain Wrote:(May 11, 2011 at 12:16 pm)Godschild Wrote: @ Cinjin Cane you seem to like poking at Frodo, prove him wrong if you can. I gave you an example and so did tackattack and you have ignored both.WHY?
I'm "poking at Frodo" because his challenge was to me. (See the OP)
GC - I will certainly give your post a rebuttal when I see something that deserves one. So far, the drivel that pours out of your fingertips onto the screen is not worthy of a response from me. You and Statler like to play by your own special rules of debate and you conclusions are never founded in legitimate rationale. Frodo's not much better, but I did agree to accept his challenge.
So you can't dispute what I've written, thats why you made an excuse not to respond. I did my research why haven't you. If you do not go to the original languages and find their meanings then reading the Bible as written in Engish can leave one confused as to what is being said.
(May 11, 2011 at 7:35 pm)Cinjin Cain Wrote:(May 11, 2011 at 7:17 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:
CC Wrote:.... Now lets get back to the real point. It is you and Nimrod who have not proven to me that "rested" does not mean "rested" and "tired" does not mean "tired".
BOTH of you have been arguing whether interpretation is valid and ignoring the real OP.
I tried to show you that rested in this case meant cease doing which in no way means resting because one is tired. You have to go back to the original languages it's just that simple. Also at my church we do go through the Hebrew and Greek to understand what was originally written.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.