(May 12, 2011 at 4:59 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote: Or, if you go back to the original Aramaic, there were two definitions of the number 300. One means just 300, and the other means 300 plus 500 more. It's obvious which definition they used here.
Don't you ever wonder why the experts who do the translations never seem to know as much as ignorant fundies about what ancient languages mean? It kind of bucks the odds, no?