RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 20, 2016 at 4:14 am
(August 20, 2016 at 1:40 am)Alex K Wrote:Yes, because we create them in an interior bend of space-time that does not support their density.(August 19, 2016 at 3:02 pm)Arkilogue Wrote: I'm willing to bet we've already discovered dark matter in the 2 heavier quark types and the 3 anti-types found through particle collision....which rapidly evaporate or annihilate in our local space-time
Our local space-time/dimension patterns for the lightest type of matter quarks....so adding the 2 heavier types, plus their 3 anti-type = 6 total types, of which our is only one. 5 times more "dark matter" in the universe than our type. They are in other folds of space-time. 6 total. Same number that super string theory says must be folded up in our 3d space.
No, the heavier quarks all decay in fractions of a second, and it can't be antimatter because that's not dark and woud've been seen
I'm saying you cannot have one type without all six types, like you don't get one color out of white light, you get all of them each time, in the same order. They are entangled from the beginning. You do not get one type of particle nor a binary super-symmetry of "dual" particles. There are 6.
Those are the super-strings we are looking for, they are not micro-knots in 3d space, they are macro containers of 3d space that interact as overlapping fields.
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder