Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 12, 2024, 3:11 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
#35
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
(August 20, 2016 at 1:40 am)Alex K Wrote:
(August 19, 2016 at 3:02 pm)Arkilogue Wrote: I'm willing to bet we've already discovered dark matter in the 2 heavier quark types and the 3 anti-types found through particle collision....which rapidly evaporate or annihilate in our local space-time

Our local space-time/dimension patterns for the lightest type of matter quarks....so adding the 2 heavier types, plus their 3 anti-type = 6 total types, of which our is only one.  5 times more "dark matter" in the universe than our type.  They are in other folds of space-time.  6 total.  Same number that super string theory says must be folded up in our 3d space.

No, the heavier quarks all decay in fractions of a second, and it can't be antimatter because that's not dark and woud've been seen
Yes, because we create them in an interior bend of space-time that does not support their density.

I'm saying you cannot have one type without all six types, like you don't get one color out of white light, you get all of them each time, in the same order. They are entangled from the beginning. You do not get one type of particle nor a binary super-symmetry of "dual" particles. There are 6.

Those are the super-strings we are looking for, they are not micro-knots in 3d space, they are macro containers of 3d space that interact as overlapping fields.
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why? - by Arkilogue - August 20, 2016 at 4:14 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Dark matter vs. MOND LinuxGal 3 886 August 23, 2023 at 8:07 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Rethinking Dark Matter/Dark energy.... Brian37 11 3015 January 26, 2018 at 7:50 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  "Super" Moon tonight! Jehanne 6 1167 December 4, 2017 at 12:36 am
Last Post: Sterben
  Are Photons the Particle Associatid with the CMB? Rhondazvous 5 1368 September 9, 2017 at 12:34 pm
Last Post: Rhondazvous
  Origin of Matter RedSox 50 20526 June 13, 2017 at 10:10 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  Anti-Matter at CERN chimp3 24 4221 December 21, 2016 at 7:12 am
Last Post: I_am_not_mafia
  First collisions at the LHC with unprecedented Energy! (Ask a particle physisicist) Alex K 385 63713 August 8, 2016 at 5:03 am
Last Post: Alex K
  A dark bulb ErGingerbreadMandude 29 3811 July 11, 2016 at 2:09 pm
Last Post: Jake Long
  Could this explian what Dark matter and Dark energy is? Blueyedlion 49 8459 June 13, 2016 at 10:28 am
Last Post: Jackalope
  Can you catch light in a pot? ErGingerbreadMandude 53 9610 June 3, 2016 at 11:56 pm
Last Post: ignoramus



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)