RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 20, 2016 at 4:42 pm
(August 20, 2016 at 5:24 am)Alex K Wrote:No, I'm following a 3d holographic map I've worked on for years that describes a supra-symmetric universe. Super-symmetry is binary and dualist, "for every right hand spin particle you need a let hand spin particle." That's not the only degree of freedom to need balancing.(August 20, 2016 at 4:14 am)Arkilogue Wrote: Yes, because we create them in an interior bend of space-time that does not support their density.
I'm saying you cannot have one type without all six types, like you don't get one color out of white light, you get all of them each time, in the same order. They are entangled from the beginning. You do not get one type of particle nor a binary super-symmetry of "dual" particles. There are 6.
Those are the super-strings we are looking for, they are not micro-knots in 3d space, they are macro containers of 3d space that interact as overlapping fields.
Wow, are you making this stuff up as you go???
Supra-symmetry is evident in the structure of the simplest atom: hydrogen - It has a large spherical component in the center with a smaller point like component flying around in a probability field making a larger sphere around the inner sphere. The inside is self similar to the outside. The above is like the below...radially. That is supra-symmetry.
Universal supra-symmetry divides the anti-matter side of the universe (top) from the matter side (bottom). How/why? Because the two regions have inverse relationships with the central point of the universe and the real outer periphery.
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder