(August 22, 2016 at 3:04 pm)Faith No More Wrote:(August 22, 2016 at 2:00 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: Good Example of what I was talking about.... Just to clarify, I do think that science may support an a priori bias, the problem is when your a prior bias interferes with what the evidence leads to, and you are dismissing or cherry picking the evidence because of.
Science is the study of the natural world. It literally doesn't deal with the supernatural by definition. That's not an a priori bias. That's just the nature of the inquiry.
I generally agree with what you said here (about the role and nature of scientific inquiry).
Let me ask you; is what qualifies as "Science" determined by the conclusion or the method used?
